Fire for Effect: “Brace yourselves, the area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive.”

This is the third salvo in Michael Rutherford’s regular column, Fire for Effect.  Take it away Mike…

Generalizations.  We love to use them and we chafe when we spot others using them.  We love the notions implied by the noun: AFOL.  I know, it’s actually an acronym… but an acronym is just a type of noun… so shut your grammar-nazi mouth already!  The notion AFOL, what does it suggest?  What do you think about when you hear it?  If you’re reading this text, the odds are that you self-identify as an AFOL.  The acronym suggests that AFOL is a thing.  If it is a thing, then it has traits that describe the thing, right? A denotative description would be a definition.   I’m not about that today, no definition is required.  No list of criteria which when applied to the subject, describe that subject in consistent and accurate detail.  Nope.  Today I’m feeling connotative.  I speak in terms of trends, norms and ambiguous suggestions that are often affiliated with the subject.

Water landing

WARNING!  We are now leaving the realm of absolutes and categoricals!  Variations, or even substantial deltas between my proffered connotations of the term AFOL and your personal traits are to be expected!  This does not indicate a catastrophic cognitive disconnect, or even that a water landing is imminent.   I do ask that you remain focused and keep your seat belt fastened while we pass through this turbulent airspace.   I’m talking about AFOLs as a population and offering some unflattering observations (Duh… Want a pat on the back?  You’ve come to the wrong shop brother!)  I’m not talking about you, or that guy next to you… or even old boy who lives way down town (on the other side of the tracks… yeah, not even that guy).  I’m talking population level generalities… and I challenge you all: Come back at me at the same level.  With counter observations (or arguments even!) that apply to the AFOL as a population.  Remember, if AFOL is a thing, then some generalizations should apply.

So let’s talk generalizations.  Here are TWO generalizations about AFOLs that I am pretty comfortable throwing out there for public consumption.  They may seem contradictory on first examination, but try these generalizations on for size:

AFOLs are sensitive people.

AFOLs are insensitive people.





SENSITIVE: AFOLs are quiet, introverted, creative people who persue a hobby that begins with a spark of inspiration and then takes form at a table, or a keyboard.  Usually in their home and often in hours of darkness.  Maybe with some music playing in the background or a favorite movie.  It’s an exercise in two parts: first in creativity and then in sharing.  Communication regarding their MOCs often take place in an on-line context and is often tumultuous and fraught with peril.  They often chafe at negative observations by fellow hobbyists regarding their MOCs, and they thrive on praise.  (STOP!  This is a description, not a value judgement!  Don’t be so sensitive!).  The AFOL is sensitive… to their own feelings.


INSENSITIVE: AFOLs look at one another’s work and often engage in rhetoric that biologists and tarot card readers both describe as snarky, smarmy, venomous, vicious, clever and perhaps even… snide.  A large telecom company recently had to replace more than 100K miles of fiber optic cable because a conversation between AFOLs reached a blistering 7.6 on the Brigs and Stratton SNARKDEX.  As you know, most commercial FO cable succumbs to heat induced breakage at 6.3! (I would tell you not to feel judged… but we are in the INSENSITIVE paragraph, so you probably wouldn’t even notice).  The AFOL is insensitive… to the feelings of other AFOLs.


I know.  These generalizations apply neither to you, nor to most of your friends…  But remember two things.  First, I am implying that most of us are hypocritical.  Second, if you disagree (Hypocrite!) then you should by all means, bust my bwalls here! So AFOLs are sensitive and mean?  How does that appear in nature?  Is it like gangs of really mean sissies?  Like a pack of rabid pansy bullies?

Yea.  Pansy bullies!  So much so, that new comers are often turned off quickly, and that damages the hobby overall.  This is why I think this topic is even remotely relevant.  Because good builders often get bludgeoned off the stage before their builds and skills ever even come close to fruition.


Yea!  And know what else?

No, what else?

I believe this so firmly, that after some prompting by Absurde, I decided to lay it all out… which brings me to the thesis of this very essay!



THESIS:  The Sensitive / Insensitive Dichotomy is endemic within the AFOL culture and readily observable in AFOL on-line group behavior.

THESIS DEVELOPMENT: Many on-line Lego fan based groups are dominated by a small cadre of original members who rely on habit and orthodoxy to lead, until challenged, at which time they attack the challenger with censor, character assignation and attacks in other forums to include the “attack critique” of their MOCs (insincere critique that is intended not to improve but to curtail future efforts).  Further, this aggressive behavior often signals the beginning of that groups decline (in terms of notoriety, influence, and activity).  Notoriety, influence and activity are relevant because they as much as anything else correspond with the group’s reason for exising in the first place (even though, such goals are seldom, if ever formally articulated any damn place).


Well, that is a pretty broad and pretty accusatory generalization!  I would love to tell you it is all substantiated in highly detailed and methodologically sound statistical research paper you can read below.  But nope.  No hard science, no math.  It’s a general assertion, and I rely on your personal experience to validate or invalidate the assertion.   It’s not a categorical assertion.  Exceptions abound!  Maybe more exceptions today than at any time sense those distant Halcyon days of LUGNET… the friendliest place on the internet… If you have a LOT of time and an ASTOUNDING level of motivation, I invite you to investigate on your own.  In fact, I encourage it!  Don’t believe it because I said it!  Believe it because you have seen it!  The truth is rotting on the beaches of a distant land called MOCpages.

Go now to the ruins of MOCpages…the sprawling island Mecca of the damned!  (Go in a Viking long-boat… it would look so cool in a movie!)

I offer MOCpages as a collection of examples of the Sensitive/Insensitive Dichotomy.  Not the site itself.  MOCpages has its own site-level problems that are not germane to my point today.     I only want you to go there so you can see the huge collection of groups within the site.  MOCpages was an excellent place for observing groups of AFOLs because there were so many of them ove the years and the corpses of those groups remain today!  These long abandoned groups remain largely unchanged by time, awaiting your perusal.


Resting at anchor around the island of MOCpages.  A fleet of the dead!  They rock gently in the slack tide, tugging at anchor chains…lamps still burning… maybe guttering now and then.  But most of these group pages are empty.  The crew members are either missing or sleeping forever, their bones invisible beneath stinking green bilge water below decks.  The conversation threads dangle lose from the rigging, or are closed, tied in perfect end-line knots, the last act of the long absent administrators… Ship Shape!  Ready for your inspection!  Waiting for years… undisturbed.  Until you, unwitting traveler, set a sanded foot carefully down upon the sun and rain warped deck planks… By the gods, what mad quest brought you to this place?  This ship of fools?  The horror… The horror… Wait!  What was that!  rowntRee!  You scared the crap out of me!  What the hell are you doing here?  Oh… this group is still active?  Well, right on!  I’m just here to look for examples of Rutherford assertion that AFOL groups are characterized by the polarized rhetoric of sensitivity and insensitivity… and that this intense polarity drives new members away from groups…



MOCpages was like a “group laboratory” where you could be member of numerous groups based on any selection criteria you could imagine.  Groups of mostly older people, younger people, gender specific groups, groups for building styles, building topic, national or regional origin, focused on the “art”, or the “Art” or improvement, or torlling… groups for chat about Lego, or just chat about general topics.  Game groups, contests, even religious factions (in their multitudes, forever and ever amen…) An endless collection of diverse groups.  All semi-formatted and ready for comparison.

Sprague-Dawley laboratory rats


STOP:  Science Check.  It is true, that by exploiting MOCpages as an example of the community at large, I am drawing a false parallel between a smaller homogeneous population (people who have self-selected to be on MOCpages) and the larger general population (everybody else).  This weakness in my data set selection is acknowledged.  MOCpages is not… the same as…the larger AFOL population.

GO: I continue on the premise that MOCpages was a “pretty good” cross-section of the North American AFOL population, and to a lesser extent of the European AFOL population (I think the Europeans are better at avoiding hyper-concentration.  To their credit, they maintain more hobby options with a smaller population).



I ran three groups amidst the gigantic ghost fleet of groups.  The first group I started was dedicated entirely to recruiting members for another group.  It was called Metal Legion Recruiting Command.  A year later I ran a sort of create your own Sci-fi adventure group called The Final Countdown.   The last group was a MOC driven wargame called Decisive Action.  All three groups were successful in my estimation.  I leave it to any surviving group members in the Manifesto audience to characterize their value.  More importantly though, I learned lots about prevailing AFOL cultural paradigms while I was running them.

Well, after anybody watches, joins and runs some MOCpages groups, certain trends emerge quite clearly.  I refer here to trends in the way “groups” behave.

Focus on this notion: Group behavior.  Not the behavior of individuals within a group.

Certain events transpire with such regularity, that I would describe them as a predictable cycle, or steps in a Group life-cycle.  Here is a short and rough version of this typical AFOL group life-cycle.

  1. Most groups form very quickly after they are conceived. (Think we should? Yes!  Let’s do it!)
  2. The formation of the group normally precedes any planning. (We will figure out all the boring details on the way!)
  3. Most growth takes place in the first week of the group’s life. (Indicated by the number of new names in threads, by day on MOCpages).
  4. Most home pages are devoid of mission / goal / purpose statements. (TLDR! TLDR!)
  5. There are almost no “bill of member rights” or similar statements.
  6. In the threads, most (More than half) of all questions asked go completely unanswered… ever.
  7. Questions that are answered are usually ASKED and ANSWERED by group admins/mods. The Founding members of the group. They engage in meaningful dialog, ignoring almost all other members.
  8. In most cases, discord erupts after growth has stopped. Discord during the early days of a group is rare. The discord is normally a slap fight between two idiots, or it is about authority (how decisions are made within the group). This second topic, “authority” is argued between new comers and the groups founding members.
  9. This is usually a powerful polarizing event, with a large vocal orthodoxy (the founding members and their supporters) and a smaller group of vocal rebels, the vast majority of group members however, never speak at all.
  10. The vocal orthodoxy normally asserts control by ejecting the rebels. And issuing proclamations that further incidents of rebellion will be met with the same swift justice.
  11. Some quiet paste-eater (a member of the previously silent majority) utters something about how the group is no fun anymore because of all the drama.
  12. There are usually a few brief discussions regarding the formation of new “fun” groups where drama will not be “allowed”.
  13. Another quiet paste-eater utters something like “hey guys, let’s get active!”.  Nobody responds.
  14. The group quickly becomes inactive, most of the members moving to another new group, only to start this group life cycle all over again.


Two important reminders here.


First, this is MOCpages.  Groups are often formed by children… but often, this label “children” is more a function of behavior than of actual age.  So the term AFOL itself is a risky label.  I acknowledge the slippery nature and some of the holes of my “AFOL Dichotomy” assertion!  Men often act like children and some children behave as men.


Second, many groups avoid the pitfalls of this “group life cycle”.  The MOCpages group “Lands of Mythron” springs to mind, an old and massive “game” based group.  The staff there is on point, they fight the tides of group self-destruction.  They also address questions quickly, mitigate the damage done by disruptive members and generally run a tight ship.  I think I would be remiss if I did not offer then a hearty “Sail on you hearty dudes!”  I just felt compelled to point those two things out, because I am asserting that most groups on MOCpages… suck.  And they suck because of the conduct of group members.


REVIEW: AFOLs are sensitive about themselves, and insensitive to one another.  This describes a broad swath of AFOL culture, but it is readily observable on MOCpages.  The part of my assertion that I have not really developed here is that this conduct drives many talented builders away from the hobby needlessly.  I fully acknowledge this underdevelopment as well.  I can’t comment from an informed perspective on WHY individuals continue to post MOCs or suddenly stop posting MOCs.  I can see them stop, but to say why they do so?  That would be folly.  I say only that I believe it is because the culture we create is one of “Take your licks newbie!” or “Newcomers eat last”.  Like the culture one might expect to find in an ancient Egyptian stone quarry, or perhaps a slave barge.



In all honesty, “Take you licks!” is not a totally unappealing value to me.  New guys adapt or get out of the way!  We are doing something here, you want to play?  Learn the rules and don’t be a cry baby!  You don’t like the rules?  The DUPLO blocks are over there, in the corner you paste eater!

Yea… Get in, get tough, get better and then get some!   Ok, it will create a strong desire to improve… quickly!  For young men and women maybe.  But for kids?  A football coach can yell “Rub grass on it and walk it off!”  That’s fair.  Encouraging resilience, and a thick skin is NOT a bad thing.  But that’s coaching isn’t it?  That’s teaching, showing, inculcating.  It’s a harsh message that points the way toward development.  Both in terms of physical toughness and a competitive mind-set.  Tough yes, but also completely developmental.  It occurs within a context that is defined by rules and unambiguous responsibility.  And that is NOT what I’m talking about here.


I’m also not saying that if you form a group, you should surrender control to the first yahoo who says you should build Pirate and not Space (obviously, Space is a better theme… duh!)  It’s your group.  Dictate the purpose, direction, and function of the group you start.  Long may you reign!  My point is that if you assume the leadership position, there are implied responsibilities.   They are not legal, not written down, not even universally understood, but if leaders embrace these implied responsibilities, their groups thrive.  If they ignore them, their groups burn out quickly.  AFOL groups tend to burn out quickly.

Implied responsibilities?  The welfare of every group member is your responsibility (obviously limited to what happens within the group!).  The right of every group member to speak and be heard.  The right of every group member to contribute.  The right of every group member to know how decisions are made (not to make the decisions… but at least to know how they are made).   Bullying, provoking, taunting, trolling… all these natural school yard behaviors… they will occur and it is the group leaders JOB to make corrections.  Not to tolerate, or ignore, or to deny, but to correct.


And again, I say that AFOLs do not show much interest in any of these topics.  Many read this list of implied responsibilities and think:  This is crap!  None of this is my job!  I just run a group where we talk about fire trucks… if this stuff happens, I’m not the world cop who has to stop it!   I’m not the protector of the weak.  But the thing is, you are exactly that.

Your not the world cop… but you are the Judge Dredd of your own little group!  It IS YOUR JOB to stop that crap.  Why?  Who cares?  Or why SHOULD we care?  Because our failure to conduct these basic policing tasks within our own groups results in a hobby that is less welcoming to new talent.  We create cruel neighborhoods where intelligent kids stop, assess, and then, seeing a teeming jungle of lawless knife wielding monkeys and not a community of creators… decide to take their talents elsewhere.   I don’t mean to other Lego groups, I mean to other hobbies.


That’s the next generation we just sent packing!

That is why Lego might go the way of Zombies and Skateboarding.  Lego could become less and less an Art form that transcend generations, always growing and improving… and slip into the shadow realm of products and fads that were big once, but have slipped largely back into obscurity.  You should strive to prevent this.


Start groups.  Maintain control of your groups.  Ensure a just and fair climate in your groups.  Recruit and retain members in for your groups.  Teach, mentor, and encourage all members of your groups.  Isolate and eject destructive individuals from your groups (yea… moral choices are real… no safety zone!).  Do this because the hobby could wither in the blink of a generation.  Water and weed the dam plants, they make oxygen and food!  It is literally that simple.

Now, I fully expect that many of you will comment that the life cycle I describe above does not correspond with your personal experience.  Did I say MANY of you?  Ok, like three or four of you and I don’t dispute it for a moment, but try and look beyond your own experience.  My assertion encompasses AFOL groups in general.  Go to the ruins!  Consult the scrolls you find in the forgotten archives!  Or at least ask one another!   Think about and attack my assertion from the population level.  I am trying to talk about us (AFOLs) as a population.  So, come back at me with observations about that same population.  I know I know… this one guy and that other guy and old girl do not fit into the Sensitive/Insensitive Dichotomy.  But does it describe “most of us”?  No?  Then describe “most of us” in your terms.  Describe your take on AFOL group behavior.  Not individual AFOL behavior.

Judge Dredd Still Image




18 thoughts on “Fire for Effect: “Brace yourselves, the area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive.”

  1. Blimey. That’s a long read. Luckily I have a 5hr flight tomorrow morning (and I’ve already exhausted all the currently available in-flight movies).


    1. Ah, that flight may save you from being pulled into the sticky fingered TLDR crowd!

      We know you have a choice when deciding who to fly with, and on behalf of our entire crew, I would like to thank you for choosing The Manifesto!


  2. I have been in active groups before, but you are kind of right. Another point: Decisive action and similar themes were indeed good groups, but I wisht there were people who could take the wheel after the first leader gets burned out, as it happened with my “active group”. I left at one point and since then, there have probably been less than a hundred (100) posts in it. Thug life.

    As a P.S., this is the weakest of your articles yet. Good premise (and some badass mental imagery), but really not much said for so many words. Or is that because I could relate to it and did not see it as something new?


    1. Großes D!

      I’m glad to be kind of right.

      I agree. Once a good group is running, a successful transition in leadership is almost never executed! I call this the Tito syndrome (Josip Broz, not Jackson!) . A person has a goal, and so long as that person is there, progress towards the goal is achieved. Regardless of style, grace, or popularity, progress is achieved, and the mission is protected. but when that leader leaves? Slovinia, Croatia, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzogovinia, Serbia, and Montenegro! Maybe good, maybe not so good… but the original effort? The original group and mission? GONE from the surface of the earth. Tito never invested in selecting, training, and developing a replacement for himself. So, when he left? Cancel the country and… break!

      We (AFOLs) do exactly the same! You will recall, that DA was started with a published end date. It was a game, and it had victory conditions. If they were never achieved, the game (and group) would be dissolved at a pre-determined time. Published and known to all participants. Was this a way to “dodge” the Tito syndrome? Yea. But it was also a mechanism that I feel was dictated by the notion of a game. Games have winners and losers. Especially WAR games (a little bit like real life… but much simpler). A game that never ends is no longer a game, but an activity. So, is there a rotting hulk named DA in the bay of MOCpages? Nope. Upon mission completion, the vessel was scuttled in the name of digital hygiene.

      The groups pile up and go flat because the founders do not decide what the group is actually for (mission). Further, leaders do not care for the members (discipline and compassion). And they now rot at anchor due to a casual disregard for the past (on to the next shiny object!).

      Most AFOLs regard the leadership of a group as a highly abstract (or at least unpleasant) distractor. It is actually the life blood of the group. The foundation, walls and roof of a group. The whole environment.

      I also agree with your assessment of this article. I think it is my weakest so far, but not for the reasons you state. I think the focus was to broad for one essay. I could have addressed the “Dichotomy” and “Group Lifecycle” in two separate posts. The concepts are linked however, and I found it hard to discuss one without moving immediately to the other.

      As to the lack of new ideas I respond thusly: We are obsessed with the new, the novel. Truth is OLD. Is this article the truth, and if not… what did I get wrong? After all, I’m only kind of right… so I must also be kind of wrong as well.

      Why aren’t there more AFOLs who “take the wheel”?


  3. Oddly enough, I find that level of involvement has an effect on the cohesion and longevity of AFOL groups. Invariably those that invest a lot of personal capital run amok of some or all of the pitfalls you’ve coloufully etched with your usual vigor. However, I can’t possibly recommend keeping the arm’s length stature that I tend to do. If everyone did, the hobby would still be loitering around the cellars of or some equally tepid and obscure unloved bog of the Internet. Blessed be the risk takers.


  4. Three things I learned from Mike’s most recent post:
    1. Mike likes words, sentences, and paragraphs.
    2. AFOLs are just like any other male dominated hobby that has an online community. A combination of pouting and shit talking.
    3. I may not be an AFOL.


    1. Ah yes… Words, sentences, and paragraphs. Three filthy habits I picked up during my time in grade school…

      As for your second and third assertion: Don’t sell yourself short! Of course your an AFOL. You’ve got pouting and shit talking down pat… and two out of three aint bad!

      Besides, “male dominated hobby”… Really? Most of the male AFOLs I know might be able to dominate a box of pop-tarts, or maybe a bag of Doritos… and that’s only after they listen to Eye Of The Tiger! But the female AFOLs? Nope, I don’t think they feel to “dominated.” I got me a 13 year old daughter who builds Lego Pokémon mosaics. I don’t think she feels dominated by the males in the hobby either. I’ll ask her, but I doubt it.


      1. Mel Finelli (Melan-E on Flickr) might be a good person to reach out to on this subject. I know she led a panel discussion on being a female AFOL at Brickworld this year, but I didn’t actually go to any of the panels, so I dunno if it was any good or not.


      2. Oh, you’re so sweet. I’m a pouter from way back.
        I meant simply it seems there are fewer female AFOLS than male. Not that we are somehow dominated by them, or intimidated. Perhaps I’m just lazily reading too much Keithlug and not browsing enough Flicker. Surely there are tons of lady lugs out there that I have yet to discover.

        Thanks for the suggestion, Christopher.

        Next guest blogger should be your daughter, Mike!


  5. I think the sensitive/insensitive dichotomy and grown adults acting like children applies to most places on the internet. Maybe it’s more extreme with AFOLs, but that’s hard to say.

    I don’t have much to offer to the discussion on group dynamics, as that’s all pretty alien to me. I’m a weirdo who lurked for 8 years before posting a MOC and the most I’ve ever done with groups is enter the occasional contest, although I did participate in an impromptu collab at Brickworld this year because I liked the inspiration behind it and figured it would be a good icebreaker for my first con. I’ve always thought of the community as pretty drama-free but I guess that’s because I never really explored much of it outside of just commenting on photos (I’ve checked out Eurobricks maybe twice). Honestly, this is the only site where I’ve ever been this active. The idea that the community as a whole might be toxic to new members never occurred to me before, but that doesn’t really surprise me either, considering all the egos involved and the fact that this is the internet.


    1. Chris, you and Gil both highlight two inescapable ironies imbedded in this topic. They both have to do with the difference between leadership and power.

      The first irony is that while the vast and silent majority of group members do not consider themselves to be group leaders, the actual power in groups resides… within that same vast silent majority! Group leaders are only leaders because the majority of group members deem them worthy of following. It is the silent majority of group members who empower the official leaders by following them. On-line, that is the only type of leadership that there is, because the option of simply leaving is always available to the other group members.

      The second irony, is that most group members consider the topic of group dynamics to be more about group leaders than any other group member. Leaders are louder and more visible. Leaders determine the function and goal of a group. Leaders are in charge right? But in reality, the leader is not one iota more important then the rest of the team. Leaders without teams backing them have no power… and we call them individuals.

      So, while most of us may not want to be group leaders, it is every bit as important to decide upon what bases will we empower others! Regardless of our job titles, we ALL create the leaders who in turn influence our own culture. It’s cyclic and on going. A process.

      So we are all in the middle of group dynamics whether we are the loud mouth, the wall flower, the gate keeper, the joker, the technician, the hanger-onner, the outlier or any other member of the cast.

      Group leader is just one more dork on the stage man.

      As always thanks to both you and Gil for the feedback. You guys make the writing worth wile!



  6. The true dichotomy is that we are primarily observers. It is quintessential to our personality types to not take sides, leadership, or even be controlled and it is what draws us to LEGO in the first place. It has always been described as the free-spirit, artistic mind and it is essentially a misnomer. I think it is more quantum than that. It resides in the brick itself. The simple made complex by us is just how our brains work. Not to say that it becomes more complicated (although I did have to reassemble Simon’s trash truck for Bucharest. ZING!) but it becomes more layered and detailed and broader at the same time. It also becomes more focused so that any other relevancy becomes irrelevant because we prioritize automatically. Leading a group is back burner shit in comparison to how one can drive matt crazy trying to figure out how the hell the front bumper goes on around that canopy. I think it also relies on the constant struggle to maintain a balance between control and freedom in us and in all these cyber-environs we choose to float through.

    Shit Mike, this is enough meat to throw out several FFEs in a single article. We are dealing with our psychological make up and defense mechanisms in very broad strokes and I think it might be a little much for a lot of us to take in at one helping. I have to admit that I’ve written several responses over the past day only to not post them as they cannot cover the entirety of the subject as it deserves. A great topic to be sure and one that will no doubt require referencing, but unfortunately I cannot dispute the sad reality of any of your assertions in spite of the grand picture not doing the individual paint strokes justice. Kudos.


  7. Well, brickshelf certainly had less drama than flickr, from what I hear, but on the other hand how do you form a community without being able to communicate?

    I totally agree that if you run a group, you should have rules, make those rules clear to everybody, and enforce them. Unfortunately there’s assholes on the planet (yes, there are, and no amount of political correctness is going to help), and they tend to show up everywhere eventually, and not all of them have a warning tattooed on their foreheads. Kick them out of your group if they misbehave, ban them if they come back and still haven’t learned a lesson.

    About encouraging new people to stay in the hobby, I think one great thing to do is, if you see someone new doing something that you like or at least has some detail that you like, leave them a nice comment. Just let them know there’s people who are interested in what they have to contribute.


    1. Ah Pascal!

      Es freut mich, von Ihnen zu hören!

      Yes, structure and accountability are indispensable when running a group. Publishing, and then enforcing rules (to include enforcing them on the group leaders as well!) is a must for long term success.

      As many have pointed out, this need is NOT unique to AFOL groups. It is important to every area of on-line endeavor, and maybe important to groups in all contexts. The enforcement of just rules is a basic part of civilization itself. And yes… Asshole AFOLs (AAFLOs?) abound. So, the AFOL is just a reflection of the larger culture that produces them. Turn out, the rules that are important to society at large are also important to AFOLs too!

      Your comment on the benefit of the causal word of praise for new builders is absolutely money. You probably missed it, but we hammered that nail down into the wood a few weeks ago. Critique! Feedback! Just a recognition and a word of praise! Say something! Say anything! But TALK to the new builders!

      You nailed it my friend.

      I hope we hear more from you in the weeks ahead! We need more European voices on this blog man! Deus brings his fire every now and then… but we want more “metric rhetoric”



  8. Again. Late to the party….

    But what a party.

    I think you’ve definitely nailed down the typical cycle. As someone who has lived through and survived many of theses it’s great that someone sat down and articulated the problems that a lot of groups find themselves.

    More importantly listing down some of the corrective actions to help with potential leaders of tomorrow not fall in the pitfalls of the past.

    In a weird spot. I generally don’t like leading, but I’m a spontaneous human idea-bustion machine, and inevitable that it ends up: “why don’t you lead it then?” – well fuck.

    Here’s a another few good tips:

    1) Time box things!
    There’s far less burn out if you only have to lead it for a month in a year (which turns into two…)

    Or even make it one time and not make it drag. Contests collars are good examples where you get that initial fun impact then 4 weeks later you’re done !

    2) strong leadership.

    Yes the whole group should ( responsible for itself, but a leader that really steps up. Sets a good example trickles down.

    So if your leader is a nerd to people, your whole group likely acts jerkishly.

    I had the displeasure of being in such a group, and when it came time to found my own group I set in time frame which the leadership bad to be transitioned.

    Sounded good on paper, but then I meet Carter. The dictator of BroLUG.

    He doesn’t necessarily give a lot of say to his group, but be rules with a benevolent hand. It’s great to watch and probably the most emotionally healthy group I’ve seen.

    3) if it’s longer term, have an exit strategy/ start identifying people you think that can offload a bit or even mind the shop for awhile.

    I was very lucky with the Eurobricks Guilds of Historica. The four major leaders all burned out hard core after a year, but we brought on helpers and transitioned to them into a slower paced fame.
    4 years later, it’s still going strong.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s