Another building contest hosted by the LEGO Speederbikes group on Flickr has come and gone, and the winners are now posted. It’s the second time that I’ve been involved with hosting the contest, and from my perspective it was another successful year. Last year’s contest was always going to be tough act to follow with 336 total entries. That said, the number of total entry photos still topped out at 268 (2nd highest ever amount).
Since contest formats are what dictate the quantity of entries, I went back to determine the count of actual builders that participated in each contest. Here is my best estimation… and I spent way too much time trying to figure this out:
2009: 92 participants / 207 entries (2.25 epp; entries per participant)
2010: 88 participants / 146 entries (1.66 epp)
2011: 75 participants / 122 entries (1.63 epp)
2016: 67 participants / 67 entries (1.00 epp)
2017: 116 participants / 336 entries (2.90 epp)
2018: 105 participants / 268 entries (2.55 epp)
The 2018 contest still comes in 2nd place in both participants and entries. I was surprised that the number of participants was that high this year, based on the entry count and having a fairly similar format to last year’s contest (although it wasn’t required for “District 18” entrants to also enter the individual categories). It appears that a lot of people only entered 1 or 2 bike categories, and then bailed out on the “District” category. Perhaps a diorama was a little too ambitious for most people. Still, to those 34 people that still stepped up to the challenge we salute you!
I know some Manifesto readers had expressed that the builds didn’t excite them as much as last year, but I saw some interesting and encouraging things on a couple fronts:
- At the top of this list were the great critiques and collaboration that occurred from all around. It was good to see the community take another step-forward in bringing back “critique culture” to MOC sharing. We can’t thank Keith and Rutherford enough for spearheading that effort, and Werewolff, Hoffmann and the rest of the Manifesto readership who chimed in as well. Kudos to all.
- As a whole, I thought the speederbikes were built more compactly than in years past. There was a noticeable reduction in the number of entries that seemed way too big, or looked more like a hovercar. Many repeat contest participants also built their bikes smaller this time around.
- NPU continued to impress, especially with the larger variety of new parts that have come out year after year. Speed Champions, Mixel joints, and Constraction Fig panels FTW!!! Some speederbike silhouettes may have felt the same as in years past (“boiler-plate?”), but the ways they are getting constructed is getting further and further refined. There were so many impressive brick-built bikes, and impressive usage of the pre-fab bike chassis too.
Even though determining the total number of participants from past contests took up a lot of time, I was able to see some other interesting before-and-after trends from some repeat participants…
Stepping their game up
Some contest participants have definitely evolved their personal building style and have improved skills year-over-year. Some examples:
“The more things change, the more they stay the same…”
Then I also noticed there were some builders whose style gave me the feeling of having “déjà vu all over again.”
“Great Swap-out, Dude!”
Everyone should know I’m a big fan of the well-executed entry swap-out (since I did it myself during my 2016 contest win). Of all the entrants this year, Pico made the most significant move. His original Space Police bike entry was solid, but it was a little “too solid” and on the larger side. His replacement was a classic Space Police design that was one of the most compact speederbikes in the contest, packed with wonderful greebles and well placed stickers. It is one of those builds where everything seemed perfectly placed to me. That Fabuland Bunny Bike was also a solid entry for Abide too, which replaced his Tequila Delivery Service bike:
“NPU? Don’t mind if I do!”
There was a lot of Nice Part Usage (NPU) this year, and called out by a lot of you in your comments and critiques. These pics below call out some NPU solutions that I am personally planning to “steal with pride” for my future MOC’s.
I really liked the way James Zhan used the Friends handlebar as a kickstand (on the other hand, the windshield is kind of comical when you think of the practicality of it…)
This back array of engine exhaust pipes (beneath the backpacks) from Jon Lie was the perfect solution to a project I’m currently working on for Brickworld Chicago 2018…
I’m always a fan of spoiler part usages, so this paired configuration by GeekPerson naturally caught my eye. I’m sure I this configuration could come in handy.
“Walk the plank!”
The use of 1×4 and 1×6 tiles also caught my attention… but I guess it would have been harder not to notice those big planks of plastic strapped to the sides of a speederbike. Using that part never crosses my mind when I’m building a speederbike … just like it never crosses my mind to get those soggy chickpeas and beets that are placed on salad bars. Who eats those? I guess as in all things it is a matter of personal taste, and these gents integrated them better than I would have imagined.
… and Carter
… and Carter again…
For me, this category had 3 different speederbike building strategies fighting it out at the top; oOger building with large figure panels, Pico building up a motorcycle frame, and Guy Smiley building and shaping his bike with system parts. They all had thoughtful part placement, sticker placement, and image presentation. When oOger posted his bike, I felt that was the moment the “gauntlet was thrown down” in Enforce. Pico went back and swapped out his entry some time later, and I remembered thinking “I didn’t think anyone could catch up to oOger’s bike, but this classic Space Police bike is wicked!” Of course the final weekend always has some surprises in store, and Guy Smiley didn’t disappoint with his SWAT inspired speederbike. The only gripe was how dark that photo was. After adjusting my monitor a bit, I could see all of the wonderful details. Those white “hover pads” were delicious. oOger’s bike was in the top 3 for all four judges (no small feat), and that sealed his victory.
Winner – oOger
Abide was by far the toughest category to judge, due to all of the diversity of designs and themes. Abide set itself up to be an “anything goes” category (that is, apart from added weaponry). There were two definite strategies at play; building bikes that were job specific, and those that were “everyday” bikes. Each of the judges’ final “Top-10” lists seemed equally split along those lines, so both approaches were appreciated. I was pleasantly surprised to see a water-world vibe from many entries… and speaking of water, those turd references were definitely sinkers and not floaters.
To me, it felt like Halfbeak’s messenger bike was the one that “threw down the gauntlet” in this category, and perhaps in the overall contest as well. It was such a unique speederbike design that caught a lot of early attention. The other one that caught my attention as it was entered was Sean Mayo’s steampunk bike, having a lot to do with the unique parts usage and the presentation. Otherwise, I went over every single bike entry a couple times over in this category to determine who else would be included in my Top-10 list. I think it was just the nature of the category. In the end, it was “P.B.”, known by some as Delatassius, who carried the day… (watch out, all you DA3 players… better get to know your enemy)
Winner – P.B. (Deltassius)
The original thought for creating the Rebel category was “wouldn’t it be cool to build some roving speederbike gangs?”, and that evolved into the whole “District 18” concept. That said, we still wanted to see anyone’s interpretations of the “Rebel” category beyond that initial “gangs” idea. Leading the pack were the bikes that were intimidators, and the bikes that represented the “larger than life” personalities of their riders. No matter the interpretation, Rebels want to be noticed (… it’s just that they don’t want to be caught).
F@bz, Carter, and Djokson had some of the notable entries for me fighting it out at the top of my list. Early in the contest F@bz delivered a NPU laden bike, which is his proclivity. I haven’t seen those flexible spike parts actually flexed in many MOC’s. Then Djokson’s bike delivered with his signature style of Bionicle parts integration, and its alien vibe. Finally, Carter’s signature hands-in-tubes construction was brought back once again, with the added touch of throw-bot visors. For me, his Rebel bike was his most successful out of his 3 entries, and successful in integrating that 1×6 tile. The deft placement of a well-built “assassin droid” that could straddle the back end was a very smart play. Tim Schwalfenberg also got his sleek bike entered just in time during the post-deadline grace period (Tim also had grace in his acceptance of the missing the deadline; however others opted to petition _zenn, who made the call to extend, as he felt sympathetic to the poster confusion). This category was decided by a single point, which edged Djokson across the finish line first by a claw tip…
Winner – Djokson
The districts were so much fun to take in, and very tough to judge. These are the thoughts that were going through my mind when judging the dioramas (and not in any order of priority or weighting).
- Quality of the speederbikes (and were all 3 types present in the scene)
- Quality of the District (overall design, and building skill/techniques)
- Was their any action?
- Were the speederbikes clearly the focus of the action? Were they easy to see?
If any District scored lower than expected, it was likely due to missing the mark a little on one of those areas. On the other hand, overcompensation in one category could also carry a District higher up the rankings. It wasn’t an easy decision.
Winner – W. Navarre
All of the entries we were impressive, considering that the contest entry period only ran for 33 days. We knew that was going to be a challenge for many, with both time and available parts supply, and why we decided to allow digital entries. Not too many people took advantage of that, but it was still good to see that there were digital entries posted in all categories. In the end, including digital entries really felt like a non-issue.
For me the story of “District 18” was one of unrealized potential. There was so much anticipation based on the bikes people already posted, only for their dioramas to never materialize.
Felipe Avelar came out of the gates very strong, teasing us all with a tempting array of speederbikes just waiting to be swooshed. I thought for certain we would see something from him in the “District 18” category, but it never came to pass. Perhaps his daughter was having too much fun playing with them, and he didn’t have the heart to take them away.
More districts that I was hoping to see:
- I really wanted to see one from LEGO 7, based on his aquatic themes speederbikes (like his Lantern Taxi that I’ve already linked). I think combining his speederbikes into Shmail’s apocalyptic water-world could have made a winning combo.
- Klikstyle had some spectacular vignettes that I thought for sure were building up to becoming a district.
- Per_ig delivered some speederbikes that could have been right out of a colorful version of the Ma.K universe.
- Spac13 had me thinking that he might deliver on a Jurassic World diorama.
My mission statement for the contest, if forced to write one, would have been “to inspire lots of people to build cool things, and have fun doing it”. The number of participants indicated that we did inspire lots of people to build once again. I know that the contest also delivered on the “build cool things” part of the mission too. I hope it was enjoyable for both the participants and spectators alike, but that is not for me to decide.
What I enjoyed most was whenever someone was told that their entries were their “best MOC yet!” Contests are at their best when they can be the unexpected spark for a person to build something new, as well as a pushing them into building something they wouldn’t otherwise have considered. I’m glad that the contest could be the catalyst for many such builds this year. Keep on building!