This is the fourth salvo in Michael Rutherford’s regular column, Fire for Effect. Take it away Mike…
I’m trying to narrow my focus today. I offer a very narrow thesis and I will endeavor to get straight to it. But still… go get a beer… or two. Oh, and before we start, I am curious: How many of you read this blog in the can? A co-worker (and AFOL) told me that he habitually waits until he is in the can before he reads this blog. Like he might have time when he isn’t in the can… but he waits until he is (is in the can)… and then he reads it. I was sort of taken aback… but then I thought about it (yeah… I know. Of all the things to think about, right?). Is it a strange thing that only he does? Or is it actually a new norm that I’m just not clutched into? So, ummm… are “WE” in the can right now? You, constant reader… and I? Together, in the can? For the record, I don’t read, or write for that matter… in the can. Ever. Just so you we’re clear.
Well, I guess that pretty much shot the notion of getting right to the point. How about catching up by jumping straight to my point!
Thesis: Awards at Lego fests are good for the state of the hobby.
Competition. It is a culturally universal concept which, when controlled, can motivate innovation, improvement and excellence.
Limited competition focuses this potential but requires rules. Rules equate to cooperation. Obscure rules undermine cooperation.
Transparency prevents obscurity.
Transparency is lacking in Lego conventions.
Let’s get all Aristotelian!
- Competition fosters improvement.
- Awards are competitive.
- Awards foster improvement.
Competition. An environment and an event wherein participants try to get or win something that someone else is also trying to win: to try to be better or more successful than someone or something else (Merriam Webster). Competition is broader. It exists in a natural state. Trash the normal rhetoric about gazelles competing with cheetahs on the savanna. They don’t compete… they mutually support one another by perusing separate but interrelated agendas. Remember that it is not the cheetah with whom the gazelle competes, but rather the other gazelles. The cheetah is relevant to the gazelle… but the cheetah wants neither the limited supply of grass, nor to mate with the limited supply of hot gazelles. Yes, cheetahs and gazelles run together, at the same place and at the same time…but they are running for DIFFERENT REASONS… running DIFFERENT RACES… often right after dinner for the gazelle, and right before dinner for the cheetah. But the gazelles all know their race is not against the cheetah. It is against the next slowest gazelle (the one who the cheetah is going to actually catch). For the gazelle, it’s all about the grass and the mating (So what you’re saying is… Keith is a Gazelle?). Getting what the other gazelles want. That is the competition. Be a better gazelle, get more grass and more ass. Competition incentivizes gazelle to be BETTER gazelles. This is what I mean when I say: Competition fosters improvement. Take a look at gazelles. Most of them are pretty good at gazelling. The not so good gazelles? They are harder to spot… Usually busy feeding the cheetahs.
So its clear then. AFOLs should run across the savanna until we catch one another, and then kill and eat one another (frequently wedging our dead AFOL victim up in a tree to protect the body from other conniving AFOL rivals). NO! Don’t be silly! Most of us would stroke out from the shock to our cardiovascular systems! Duh!
Here I say only that competition is part of natural life (and yes, I have a bias towards artificial systems that “borrow” from natural systems because nature pretty consistently kicks ass!) and that it fosters improvement.
But there is more to the VALUE of COMPETITION. It is CULTURALLY UNIVERSAL. War is competition. Religion is competition (lots of overlap with war). Commerce is competition (again, with the overlap). Exploration, science, agriculture… almost every field of human culture (non-natural) has a competitive aspect. Yea rowntRee… Art as well. Further, all these fields overlap and interconnect. It’s quite a weave actually. All humans from all cultures do this stuff. You might even say it’s universal. Makes for some tough problems. COMPETITION CAN ALL BE HIGHLY DESTRUCTIVE! I mean… I started the list with WAR for god’s sake! Let’s review the concept of LIMITS… Yea?
Limited competition is all the competition that happens within agreed upon parameters. Sometimes vague, as with underlying cultural assumptions, and sometimes specific, as with… wait for it… rules. If ANY participant in a limited completion abandons these parameters, these rules… then the competition becomes unlimited again.